Vote by Mail

The "Shocking" Truth About Election Rigging in America

Monday, 05 September 2016

By Victoria CollierTruthout | News Analysis

RICK: How can you close me up? On what grounds?
POLICE CAPTAIN RENAULT: I'm shocked! Shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
CROUPIER (handing Renault a pile of money): Your winnings, sir.
CAPTAIN RENAULT: Oh, thank you, very much... Everybody out, at once!
(Scene from Casablanca.)

If there is anything positive to say about the 2016 elections, it's that they have finally forced an end to the official denial of computerized election rigging. In the past month, the fact that our voting technology is a hacker's paradise has been validated by no less than all the major TV news networks: NBCABCCBSReutersThe Washington PostThe New York TimesThe Boston GlobeThe AtlanticUSA Today,The HillThe GuardianMother JonesPolitico, and a dozen other outlets.

Of course, the corporate media and political parties are now professing "shock" at the very prospect that US elections can be manipulated, and yes, even stolen. 

Yet it has long been an open secret that game-changing races have been decided not by voters, but by insiders; from the presidential race of 1960, appropriated for John Kennedy by Democratic muscle in Chicago, to the two victories secured for George W. Bush by GOP fixers in Florida and hackers in Ohio. Among other suspect elections in recent years are key Congressional races hijacked by combinations of voter suppression, gerrymandering, dark money and the ugly little secret of American elections: rigged voting machines.

WHY ALL MAIL BALLOT ELECTIONS ARE A BAD IDEA

Adapted from Why 'Vote-by-Mail' Elections are a Terrible Idea for Democracy by Brad Friedman


Lack of Transparency: Absence of evidence does not mean absence of fraud
As with any voting system that is not fully transparent, proving mail-in fraud can be difficult or impossible. Once we drop our ballot in the mail, we can't verify what becomes of it, and elections become a matter of faith. Additionally, should our ballots arrive in the central aggregating location untampered, they are likely to be counted by the same private, secretly programmed electronic systems that have been proven vulnerable to rigging, hacking, and undetectable error. Central counting makes fraud on a large scale easier to accomplish and harder to detect. 

Lack of Security 
Ballots are stored in hundreds of thousands of locations with no security for two to three weeks. The chain of custody lacks security as the ballots are handled by many anonymous persons throughout the process. Any unmarked contest on a ballot can be marked by someone other than the voter when the ballots are opened for counting.

Voter Intimidation 
Voting can be done as a group at churches or union halls with people looking over the voter's shoulder to make sure they vote "the right way."

Election Fraud 
There is no way to be certain that the person who signed the envelope is the person to whom the ballot was sent. Ballots can be stolen from mail boxes while the voter is at work or away from home on an errand. Other tactics include vote harvesting by persons who show up at your door to "help" you vote. The elderly and those with disabilities are particularly vulnerable.

Potential for Ballot Mishandling 
Post office or contract mailing company illegally forwards ballots; more than one ballot sent to voters; postal workers put ballots in the trash. (All of these thing have happened in Colorado)

Lack of Secret Ballot 
When election judges check in your ballot, they can see how you voted when they match the inventory number on your ballot to the inventory number next to your name on the voter rolls. The Colorado Constitution guarantees your right to a secret ballot. [ed note: as do most other state Constitutions and elections code.]

Additional Resources"Why Mail Ballots Are a Bad Idea" by Charles E. Corry, Ph.D

Oregon Vote-by-Mail Process Scrutinized by GMO Labelling Supporters

Published at Pew Charitable Trust

The way in which local election officials verify signatures on mail ballots in Oregon, where elections are conducted entirely by mail, and the guidance the state provides to the counties were the subjects of a recent legal challenge.

During the November 2014 election, about 13,000 voters (out of 1.5 million statewide) submitted ballots with signatures that did not match their voter registration cards. These voters were given the opportunity to fix the problem within 14 days after the election. Roughly 8,600 responded, matched their signatures, and had their ballots counted. However, about 4,600 did not return corrected signatures, and their ballots were not counted.

The suit, which was denied by the court, alleged that some of those uncounted ballots were improperly rejected because:

  • Some voters never received notification their signatures did not match.
  • For some voters with disabilities, their signatures had changed or they had used stamps for their signatures.
  • The secretary of state’s office did not confirm that counties consistently applied the instructions for signature verification.
  • The instructions provided to voters did not state that the signatures had to match in order for the ballots to be counted.

Supporters of Proposition 92, which would have mandated the labeling of genetically modified foods, brought the suit. The race went to an automatic recount, and the lawsuit sought to have the rejected ballots considered for counting before the results were certified. The proposition lost by only 812 votes.

Concerns with Oregon’s vote-by-mail

by Sen. Doug Whitsett

Oregon and its people have long prided themselves on their Pioneer Spirit, a willingness to embrace new ideas long before other states decide to do so. And while I applaud that in part, it has also prompted a series of potentially problematic policies that continue to harm the state. Examples include our unique land-use system, which has stunted economic growth throughout rural Oregon for decades. Another example is our unique vote-by-mail system.

Vote-by-mail began with the overwhelming passage of Measure 60 in the 1998 general election. The measure passed with around 69 percent of the vote, and made Oregon the first state in the nation to do its elections exclusively by mail. Prior to that, the concept had been introduced incrementally.

Our history of vote-by-mail began as far back as 1981, when the Legislature approved it under certain conditions for local elections. The practice became widespread among the counties over the following six years.

In 1992, a task force on local government services determined that the state could save money by doing all of its elections in such a manner. Three years later, Oregon was the first state in the union to do a federal primary exclusively by mail.

Early supporters of the concept included groups like the League of Women Voters, the League of Conservation Voters and the Oregon Education Association.

The 2000 election saw Oregon become the first state to do a presidential election by mail. But despite this, it took over a decade for any other state to follow suit.

Washington’s Legislature passed a law in 2011 requiring all of its counties to do vote-by-mail. Local governments had the option of conducting their elections by mail since 1987, and the practice had been allowed for statewide elections since 1993. Colorado became the third state to adopt vote-by-mail in 2013.

All of this begs the question of why this practice hasn’t caught on in more states.

This document produced by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) asks that question, and identifies several issues surrounding vote-by-mail, as well as approaches other states have taken on this matter.

It states that legislators throughout the country introduced 42 bills in 2013-14 related to vote-by-mail. In that period of time, lawmakers in Alaska rejected a proposal to establish vote-by-mail for general elections, and their counterparts in Georgia failed to pass a resolution to study all-mail elections. The document also cites research that determined that “vote by mail in Oregon only affected turnout during special elections.”

Issues identified in the NCSL document include that of “leakage,” which is defined as the circumstances under which ballots are requested and not received, transmitted but not returned for counting or returned for counting but rejected. A lack of chain of custody procedures remains a specific security concern for researchers from the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.

One of the best sources for information on problems related to vote-by-mail comes from our own Secretary of State’s office. It maintains this log of prosecuted election law complaint cases related to voting.

Read Full Story

 

89 ARTICLES ON WHY VOTING BY MAIL IS A VERY BAD IDEA

89 ARTICLES ON WHY VOTING BY MAIL IS A VERY BAD IDEA

From the No Vote by Mail Project

  1. What’s Wrong With Voting by Mail or Absentee Ballot

  2. The Death of the Polling Place

  3. Absentee Ballot Fraud Hits Texas, Grannyfarming a longterm problem

  4. Milwaukee Police Find Numerous Cases of Absentee Vote Fraud

  5. Vladimir Putin Prefers Voting By Mail

  6. Don’t Forget to Sign Your Ballot

  7. Absentee voting on the rise, who’s pushing this agenda?

  8. Vote-By Mail disenfranchises 1/3rd of Kitsap County Primary Voters

  9. New Jersey Voters Vote Again?

  10. MIT Study says “Abolish on-demand absentee voting”

  11. Vote-By Mail and Electronic Poll Books

  12. More Vote By Mail Problems in California

  13. Oklahoma State Auditor and wife charged with Mail Fraud

  14. California’s televised primary debates miss many voters

  15. California Primary Slowed By Vote-By Mail, Absentee Ballot Count

  16. Another Case of Vote-By Mail Fraud

  17. Democrats say, ”An easier way to vote fraudulently is by mail”

  18. How VBM is Screwing Up California’s Primary

  19. Postmasters Lobby for Vote-By Mail

  20. Absentee Ballot Fraud Alleged in Putin’s Election

  21. Just where or where has my mail ballot gone?

  22. Colorado Voter Group Opposes Vote-By Mail Switch

  23. 4204 Passing, King County Gets the Blame

  24. Absentees and Optical Scans, a Combination that Doesn’t Work

  25. Day 6 of vote counting in King County

  26. Poll Votes much faster to count then Absentee Ballots

  27. Did you already vote by mail? Well it’s too late to change your mind now…

  28. More Absentee Ballot Fraud

  29. Expanding and Improving Opportunities to Commit Vote By Mail Fraud

  30. Vote by Mail Fraud, You Don’t Say

  31. Absentee Ballot Problems in Akron, Ohio

  32. More research shows vote by mail systems do NOT increase turnout

  33. King County Executive, Ron Sims, Contracts to Buy Ballot Tracking Vaporware

  34. Hanky Panky In Union Vote-By Mail Scheme

  35. The Election is in the Mail… Day 14

  36. Some Democrats Reject Forced Vote-By Mail

  37. Vote by mail increases turnout?

  38. My mail from June 13, 2006

  39. Vote Buying (You don’t say)

  40. Voter turnout – higher or lower or the same?

  41. VBM turns out about 1/3rd of Washington Voter’s

  42. King County Adds 27,114 Votes in 3rd Day of Counting

  43. 4th Day of Vote Counting brought to you by Vote-by Mail

  44. 1 Week Later… Votes still coming in to King County Elections

  45. 798 More Ballots Arrive One Week After the Election…

  46. US Postal Service Unions Pushing Vote-By Mail

  47. King County wraps up seventh day of vote counting

  48. Diebold Dazzles (King County) Democrats

  49. Colorado Editorial: Ripe for Fraud

  50. Montana’s Secret Ballot Increasingly Endangered Species

  51. Postmaster General Adresses National Association of Secretaries of State

  52. Let’s all vote by mail, just like…Texas

  53. Hand Counted Paper Ballots for 2008?

  54. Barack Obama Targets Vote Banking through Vote By Mail in California

  55. Pierce County Sacrifices Polling Places for Forced Vote By Mail Absentee Voting

  56. Granny Farming of Absentee Ballots in NJ

  57. More on Kentucky Absentee Ballot Fraud

  58. Take the Last Train to Clarksville, and Don’t forget to Vote

  59. More Absentee Votes Might Not Count Due to County Errors

  60. King County’s Wreckless Plan to Switch To Vote-By Mail

  61. Harvard’s Ben Adida on Vote By Mail and the Secret Ballot

  62. Saving Money At The Price Of Democracy

  63. Vote-By Mail Lobbyist Targets Colorado

  64. King County, WA, 13 Days of Vote Counting, Seattle Special Election, 2007

  65. Why Mail Ballots Are a Bad Idea

  66. New Report on Vote By Mail, VBM Does Not Really Increase Turnout

  67. George Galloway Blasts UK’s Postal Voting System

  68. Oregon and Other States Mail Service Outsourced?

  69. Vote Buying, Bath County, KY

  70. New Group to Push VBM Nationally

  71. Taiwanese Mull Absentee Voting, and China’s Potential Influence On Voters

  72. The “Myth” of Vote Fraud

  73. The Death of the Polling Place, Island County, WA

  74. “Granny Farming” Allegations in Michigan, Virginia, and California moves towards VBM

  75. Vote By Mail a Growing National Attack on Democracy

  76. More Postal Vote Fraud in the UK

  77. Vote Buying in Kentucky

  78. When a Secret Ballot Isn’t Really A Secret Ballot

  79. Prosecuting Honest Voters Does Not Restore My Confidence In Forced Mail Voting

  80. Vote By Mail, Not Cheaper, No Suprise

  81. Absentee Ballot Fraud Allegations and other News, 1/24/2007

  82. California Declares Mail Ballot Only Precincts 

  83. NJ Absentee Ballot Stuffing

  84. Oregon We Have a Problem

  85. The Ongoing Drama of Absentee Voting Problems

  86. Mayor Uses Absentee Ballots to Rig Election, Dateline Nov. 30th, 2006

  87. One Month After the Election… Votes Still Being Counted

  88. Vote By Mail-A Great Example of Voting Badly

  89. More Electoral Fraud By Mail – Dec. 12, 2006

 

“Election rules should seek to minimize the number of provisional ballots cast."

— Thad E. Hall and Tova Andrea Wang

"The more provisional ballots that are cast by voters, the longer it will take to authenticate the provisional ballots, integrate these ballots with the ballots tabulated on election day, and achieve an accurate vote count," write Hall and Wang in "International Principles of Election Integrity."

Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — On the morning of the primary here in August, the local elections board met to decide which absentee ballots to count. It was not an easy job.

The board tossed out some ballots because they arrived without the signature required on the outside of the return envelope. It rejected one that said “see inside” where the signature should have been. And it debated what to do with ballots in which the signature on the envelope did not quite match the one in the county’s files.

“This ‘r’ is not like that ‘r,’ ” Judge Augustus D. Aikens Jr. said, suggesting that a ballot should be rejected.

Ion Sancho, the elections supervisor here, disagreed. “This ‘k’ is like that ‘k,’ ” he replied, and he persuaded his colleagues to count the vote.

Scenes like this will play out in many elections next month, because Florida and other states are swiftly moving from voting at a polling place toward voting by mail. In the last general election in Florida, in 2010, 23 percent of voters cast absentee ballots, up from 15 percent in the midterm election four years before. Nationwide, the use of absentee ballots and other forms of voting by mail has more than tripled since 1980 and now accounts for almost 20 percent of all votes.

Yet votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show. Election officials reject almost 2 percent of ballots cast by mail, double the rate for in-person voting.

“The more people you force to vote by mail,” Mr. Sancho said, “the more invalid ballots you will generate.”

Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.

In 2008, 18 percent of the votes in the nine states likely to decide this year’s presidential election were cast by mail. That number will almost certainly rise this year, and voters in two-thirds of the states have already begun casting absentee ballots. In four Western states, voting by mail is the exclusive or dominant way to cast a ballot.

The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.

Read the Full Story